nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Pentest discussion: Reviewing token revocation behavior

AdminUser

Seeded test discussion. How would you validate reviewing token revocation behavior in an authorized engagement?

Scenario: Revoke a test API token and check that subsequent benign calls fail within the expected window. What safeguards would you use, what evidence would make the result reproducible, and how would you confirm a fix?

Comments

AdminUser

Testing approach: Revoke a test API token and check that subsequent benign calls fail within the expected window. Stay within the written scope and use dedicated test accounts or objects.

AdminUser

Evidence: Record token ID, revocation time, response status, and cache behavior without storing the token. Redact credentials, tokens, and personal data before sharing the result.

AdminUser

Fix and retest: Enforce revocation across services and use short token lifetimes. Repeat the original check after deployment and record the outcome.