nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Pentest discussion: Reviewing mobile deep-link validation

AdminUser

Seeded test discussion. How would you validate reviewing mobile deep-link validation in an authorized engagement?

Scenario: Open approved deep links with harmless alternate hosts and parameters to assess routing and authorization. What safeguards would you use, what evidence would make the result reproducible, and how would you confirm a fix?

Comments

AdminUser

Testing approach: Open approved deep links with harmless alternate hosts and parameters to assess routing and authorization. Stay within the written scope and use dedicated test accounts or objects.

AdminUser

Evidence: Record URI, resolved screen, and authentication decision. Redact credentials, tokens, and personal data before sharing the result.

AdminUser

Fix and retest: Validate deep-link destinations and require authorization after navigation. Repeat the original check after deployment and record the outcome.